There are sooo many flaws in this. Currently we are being forced to set up the vendor profile reflecting their 1099 address only and if there is a different "remit to" this needs to be set up in a drilled down, non transparent table consisting of every other vendors with "remit to" address variations. The mind set on this is completely backwards, the 1099 should be in a separate field if needed, and the vendor remit should always be primary and fully transparent in the vendor profile. Our front desk has no idea what address a check was sent to when a vendor calls requesting payment status because there is nothing in the vendor profile indicating there is any other address their check could have been mailed to.
*More than 1 "remit to" address would be ideal as well, I know i'm pushing it now but vendors have multiple addresses and we cannot set up duplicate vendors so what options do we have to decide which office we are mailing their checks to?

by: Amy S. | 18 days ago | Accounts Payable