I tried a test run of preparing my 1095-C thru Aatrix. It prepared a 1095-C for any employee that DID NOT have "not working" in their master file. I was told by Timberline Support that is how it currently determines which employees it produces a 1095-C for. It is my understanding that a 1095-C is only necessary for "Full Time" employees. I have 106 Full time employees and it produced 353 1095-C's. Many of these employees are still currently working but based either our initial measurement period or standard measurement periods and their hours of work they did not qualify as Full Time employees. It should look at the ACA file for the year that the return is for and based on the information in the detail field (if any month is marked Full Time in ACA Exempt), then produce a 1095-C.
by: Michele M. | over a year ago | 6 Payroll
Comments
After further testing you can select which employees to print a 1095-C for , but if they have NOT WORKING in their masterfile in the ACA exempt field they will not print even if you select them.
Yes, This is absolutely crazy. I think that the programmers should put aside everything and get this fixed ASAP. We have 871 1095's being produced but only have about 581 active employees who worked in 2015. I feel sorry for those who have 3,000 employees with only 300 employees who should get it.
Yes, This is absolutely unbelievable. Our company has 155 who should get 1095's but the report shows 788. Programs need to fix immediately.
Thanks.
Is your data from your employee master showing on the report under Tasks, ACA Compliance? Our dependent data is not showing on the report but is entered under the employee master and would like to know if others are having this issue?
THIS IS CRAZY.. THE REPORT GAVE ME 2833 EMPLOYEES , I HAVE 1345 TO PRINT..
Need ability to setup criteria about how we are tracking in Sage and then have canned reports and processes (I had to create my own to do all of this for something that is required I would have thought Sage would make it better and easier for customers for ACA compliance not bare bones): Regular FT or Variable Hour, Monthly or Lookback Method, Initial Measurement Period, On-going Measurement Period, Administrative Period for Initial and On-going, Stability Period for Initial and On-going.
Big issue with this!! We need the ablity to only bring in employees who had earnings during the year for which we are producing 1095C forms. We tend to leave terminated employees in our current file because it is easier to track their information if they are rehired during high volumn work times. Would love to see a fix for this soon.
This is still an issue for 2016 and boy am I frustrated. I have 5000 employees in my master file, but only 700 active for this year. I have to go into the "employees to process" window a MANUALLY select the employees. It looks like ZERO development has been done to correct this since last year and I find it discouraging.
Agreed this is a big problem. Manually selecting the active employees is crazy. It should pull the information from the ACA compliance task. Please, Please, Please address this.
We agree that the system needs to only bring employees who had earnings during the year for which we are processing 1095 forms.