It would be really helpful if we are able to have both Job and Non-Job related lines when capturing an Invoice through AR. Some things might be job related, and others, such as transport not. At the moment we need to capture 2 seperate invoices, which is messy.

Comments

  • this logic should also be ported to A/P and P/O. It's useless how at present a document has to be one or the other.. the only way to get around it at present is to create two part documents for the same thing.

  • I agree - particularly necessary for PO. Purchasing some goods for Jobs and others (such as spares) for inventory happens all the time. Sending 2 POs to the supplier is really bad.

  • I agree. It look silly to have dummy job when we face situation like this.
    Hope AP Invoice screen too has this improvement.

  • I agree, we have just gone live and can't believe this ridiculous feature. We bought accpac to be more efficient not to double our workload!

  • I agree, Blanket Orders can cover goods which can be either Job Cost or General Ledger.

  • I agree should be AP Also

  • I agree. Required in both Ar and AP

  • This has been on our wish list for years! Definitely required in AP as well.

  • Agree with above

  • I just had 2 other customers ask for this same thing - particularly with regard to PO and PJC. We definitely need to be able to split a PO into both job-related and non-job-related.

  • Process flow needs to be reviewed, in PJC there is Billable, Non-Billable or No-Charge categories, not sure if this will help with spliting AR Billings into Billable (Job or No-Charge) or Non-Job (No-Charge) categories. Just an idea?
    mcarsan@baass.com